koos for joint replacement (jr) (ProMIS Neurosciences)

About

News

Press Release

Team

Advisors

Partners

Contact

Bioz Stars

Bioz vStars

Buy from Supplier

Structured Review

ProMIS Neurosciences koos for joint replacement (jr)
Koos For Joint Replacement (Jr), supplied by ProMIS Neurosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/koos-jr/koos+for+joint+replacement++jr+/pm40436080-30-62-31
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews

koos for joint replacement (jr) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09

90/100 stars

Images

other:

Article Title: Patient-Reported Outcomes following Cemented versus Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A comparative analysis based on propensity score matching
Article Snippet: Page 10/22 Table 3 Results from Propensity Score Matching (1-to-1 matching) Outcomes KOOS-Jr PROMIS-PH NPRS β P β P β P Surgical approach (ref = cementless) Cemented -1.37 .113 -0.11 .766 -0.34 .022 Follow-up (ref = baseline) 1-month 15.7 .000 3.43 .000 -2.48 .000 3-month 21.0 .000 5.90 .000 -3.17 .000 6-month 23.5 .000 7.17 .000 -3.42 .000 Approach interaction (ref = cementless) Cemented *1-month 2.46 .042 0.61 .303 0.04 .862 Cemented *3-month 2.80 .037 1.19 .076 -0.07 .740 Cemented *6-month 3.33 .028 0.69 .302 0.05 .836 AGE Age (mean) 0.27 .000 0.09 .000 -0.03 .000 Sex (ref = male) Female -1.48 .023 -1.09 .001 0.20 .058 Body Mass Index -0.08 .091 -0.16 .000 0.002 .813 Race (ref = white) Black -3.41 .004 -1.86 .000 1.11 .000 Other or multiple -1.39 .271 -1.91 .000 0.58 .001 Hispanic (ref = no) Yes 2.51 .106 1.28 .064 0.43 .077 Education (ref = less than college) Note: The estimated coe cients were from 1 to 1 nearest matching within caliper (0.25 SD) A responder analysis shows the proportion of patients within each group who achieved the MCID in each outcome over time (Fig. 4).

Article Title: Patient-Reported Outcomes following Cemented versus Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A comparative analysis based on propensity score matching
Article Snippet: Page 8/22 Table 2 Adjusted Mean Patient-Reported Outcomes and Improvements by Month (1:1 matching) Total Knee Arthroplasty Cemented Cementless N Mean 95% CI N Mean 95% CI KOOS-Jr. Baseline 723 48.9 (47.8–50.0) 763 48.7 (47.5–49.8) 1-month 723 66.6 (65.4–67.8) 763 65.0 (63.7–66.2) 3-month 723 72.3 (71.1–73.6) 763 70.9 (69.6–72.2) 6-month 723 75.1 (73.8–76.3) 763 73.9 (72.6–75.3) 1-mon-Base 723 17.7 (16.5–18.9) 763 16.3 (15.1–17.5) 3-mon-Base 723 23.4 (22.1–24.6) 763 22.3 (21.0–23.5) 6-mon-Base 723 26.2 (24.9–27.4) 763 25.3 (24.0–26.6) PROMIS-PH Baseline 723 42.6 (42.0–43.2) 763 42.2 (41.6–42.9) 1-month 723 46.5 (45.9–47.1) 763 45.8 (45.1–46.4) 3-month 723 49.6 (49.0–50.2) 763 48.4 (47.7–49.1) 6-month 723 50.2 (49.6–50.9) 763 49.6 (49.0–50.3) 1-mon-Base 723 3.9 (3.4–4.5) 763 3.5 (3.0–4.0) 3-mon-Base 723 7.0 (6.5–7.6) 763 6.2 (5.6–6.7) 6-mon-Base 723 7.7 (7.1–8.2) 763 7.4 (6.8–8.0) NPRS Baseline 723 5.3 (5.1–5.5) 763 5.7 (5.6–5.9) 1-month 723 2.9 (2.7–3.1) 763 3.2 (3.0–3.4) 3-month 723 2.1 (1.9–2.3) 763 2.5 (2.3–2.7) 6-month 723 2.0 (1.8–2.2) 763 2.3 (2.1–2.5) 1-mon-Base* 723 -2.4 (-2.6 – -2.2 ) 763 -2.5 (-2.7 – -2.3) 3-mon-Base* 723 -3.2 (-3.4 – -3.0) 763 -3.2 (-3.4 – -3.0) 6-mon-Base* 723 -3.3 (-3.5 – -3.1) 763 -3.5 (-3.7 – -3.3) * Lower scores are better, so that negative signs represent improvement Note: Baseline, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month represent absolute score at each time point, while 1- mon-Base, 3mon-Base, and 6-mon-Base represent changes at1,3,6 months from baseline.

Article Title: Hip and knee replacement in lower limb amputees: a scoping review
Article Snippet: For patients receiving TKR, five different PROMs were reported (Table ): OKS (pain and function), AKSS (pain, ROM, clinical assessment, stability, function), PROMIS-10 (health status, quality of life, pain, function), KOOS-JR (pain, function, independence, quality of life), VR-12 (health status, function, mental health).

Article Title: Establishing the Minimally Important Difference for the KOOS–Joint Replacement and PROMIS Global–10 in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Article Snippet: Older age was associated with higher odds of achieving the KOOS-JR at early follow-up (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P = .01), while female sex was associated with higher odds of achieving the MID for the early and late KOOS-JR and the PROMIS 10 MH ( P < .05).

Article Title: Outcomes After Successful Debridement, Antibiotic, and Implant Retention Therapy for Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article Snippet: Background: Controversy surrounds debridement, antibiotic and implant retention (DAIR) for treatment of acute periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).. Data regarding DAIR’s rate of infection resolution is variable with little investigation of functional outcomes.. Methods: We identified 191 DAIR cases at a single institution from 2008 to 2020.

Article Title: Relationship Between the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System and Traditional Patient-Reported Outcomes for Osteoarthritis.
Article Snippet: Background: Incorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is paramount to the creation of a valuebased healthcare system that prioritizes patient-centered care in total joint arthroplasty.. The relationship between global assessment PROs such as Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and joint-specific PROs for hip and knee, such as short form variations of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-JR) and Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOSJR), has yet to be assessed.. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to assess PRO measurements for knee-related and hiprelated complaints.

Article Title: A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery.
Article Snippet: Êi = 1.4162*B – 0.4162; where B = eA/(1 + eA); Pain3and A = 3.7265 – 0.0091*–––– – 0.1145*Function + Function2 10 4 Function3 0.1633*–––––– – 0.0948*––––––; 100 10 4 Bidirectional crosswalks, mainly using equipercentile equating methods, to convert Oxford Hip Scores and Oxford Knee Source PROM: Hip-specific Oxford Hip Score: – EQ-5D-3L – EQ-5D-5L – HOOS-Function – HOOS-JR – HOOS-12 HOOS-Function: – Oxford Hip Score – PROMIS-Physical function HOOS-JR: – Oxford Hip Score – WOMAC Index HOOS-12: – Oxford Hip Score Source PROM: Knee-specific Oxford Knee Score: – EQ-5D-3L – EQ-5D-5L – KOOS-12 – KOOS-JR KOOS-Function: – PROMIS-Physical function HOOS-JR: – Oxford Knee Score – WOMAC Index KOOS-12: – Oxford Knee Score Original Knee Society Score: – 2011 Knee Society Score methods.

Article Title: Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Scores Predict Patients Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in the Early Postoperative Time Period After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Article Snippet: Introduction: The patient-specific factors influencing postoperative improvement after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are important considerations for the surgeon and patient.. The primary purpose of this study was to determine which patient demographic factors influence the postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health (GH) scores.. In addition, we aimed to compare the prognostic utility of preoperative PROMISGH scores and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) in predicting postoperative

Review

koos for joint replacement (jr) (ProMIS Neurosciences)

Structured Review

Images

Related Articles

other:

Similar Products

Image Search Results